Delivery

Wrap a sprint with clarity

Use Template

By Nalvin

Use Template

Description

Nalvin helps you close the sprint by drafting a sprint review summary: what shipped, what changed, what we learned, and what’s next. It compiles completed work from your project system and can incorporate meeting notes when available, so you end the sprint with a clear record that’s easy to share across teams.

Supported Integrations

Templates are flexible by default. Nalvin automatically picks the right integrations based on what you’ve connected.

Asana

ClickUp

Zoom

Monday

Trello

Google Meet

Fireflies

Shortcut

Linear

Microsoft Teams

Jira

Slack

How to best use this template

Below are a few tips & tricks from the Nalvin team to get the most out of this template.

Use a specific sprint or time window

If you can provide an iteration name/ID, results are cleaner than a broad date range. When unsure, a simple “last 2 weeks” window is a good fallback.

Group by outcomes, not tasks

You can level this up by asking Nalvin to summarize outcomes and user value, then list supporting work items underneath. This keeps the review relevant to stakeholders.

Capture learnings and tradeoffs

A good sprint review isn’t just a changelog. Have Nalvin include 2–3 learnings (what went well, what slipped, what surprised us).

Add a “what’s next” section

Ask Nalvin to propose the next sprint’s focus based on carryover, risks, and dependencies. This creates continuity instead of a hard reset each sprint.

Keep it short enough to read

A review that’s too long won’t get read. Keep highlights to 3 bullets and put details behind a short “More context” section.

Use a specific sprint or time window

If you can provide an iteration name/ID, results are cleaner than a broad date range. When unsure, a simple “last 2 weeks” window is a good fallback.

Group by outcomes, not tasks

You can level this up by asking Nalvin to summarize outcomes and user value, then list supporting work items underneath. This keeps the review relevant to stakeholders.

Capture learnings and tradeoffs

A good sprint review isn’t just a changelog. Have Nalvin include 2–3 learnings (what went well, what slipped, what surprised us).

Add a “what’s next” section

Ask Nalvin to propose the next sprint’s focus based on carryover, risks, and dependencies. This creates continuity instead of a hard reset each sprint.

Keep it short enough to read

A review that’s too long won’t get read. Keep highlights to 3 bullets and put details behind a short “More context” section.